The ICC is likely to debate the effectiveness and accuracy of the Umpires Decision Referral System with the use of existing technology during its chief executive meeting in London later this month.
Click here!
Sources in the board said that although the ICC was yet to release the agenda for the meeting that will take place on the sidelines of the ICC awards from September 12, there is every likelihood of the UDRS issue coming up for discussion at the meeting of the CEOs.
The debate on the UDRS got heated again during the India and England series and the first Test between Sri Lanka and Australia in Galle.
Australia umpire Simon Taufel, the senior international umpire, has referred Phil Hughes' second innings lbw dismissal in the first Test to the ICC as a serious question mark against the accuracy of Hawk-Eye, the ball tracking technology.
Taufel and the officiating umpires Richard Kettleborough, Aleem Dar and Tony Hill have also sent the relevant footage of the incident to the ICC's cricket operations department.
Taufel has observed the first two days of the first Test at Galle in part to assess the impact of technology's inconsistent use and accuracy, having umpired in England's home series against India under vastly different playing conditions and technological aids.
Taufel has said the ICC needed to see the veracity of devices such as Hawk-Eye, HotSpot and Virtual Eye via independent testing that sits outside the views of broadcasters and suppliers.
In the England and India series, senior batsman Rahul Dravid has now thrice suffered from debatable caught behind decisions despite them being referred to the television umpire raising questions about the accuracy of the modern technology.
The source in the PCB said that Pakistan's stance on the use of the UDRS remained unchanged.
"We still believe that it is a effective tool to reduce mistakes and errors in international matches but obviously discussions can be held on further improving the technological support for the system," the source said.
"Overall if you look at the big picture the system has been pretty effective especially during the World Cup and it has helped umpires," the source noted.
Asked if the chief executives meeting would debate on the response of the Pakistan board to the recommendations made by the special task force on Pakistan cricket, the source said this was an issue that was taken up at the highest level by the executive board of the ICC.
Monday, September 5, 2011
Friday, September 2, 2011
We are trying to turn things around
India may have suffered a humiliating 0-4 loss to England in the Test series, but Virat Kohli says there is nothing to be embarrassed about. Instead, the team, he feels, will now be able to play with out any pressure.
"There is no embarrassment. We didn't play good cricket and were beaten fair and square. If you play so much, this kind of phase happens. How you come back and fight is important. We are working hard and trying to turn things around," Kohli said, ahead of Saturday's first ODI against England.
"If it was before the tour began, there would have been pressure on us [to live up to World champions status]. Now, considering how the tour has gone, it's up to us to just focus on cricket and not anything else," he added.
"There is no embarrassment. We didn't play good cricket and were beaten fair and square. If you play so much, this kind of phase happens. How you come back and fight is important. We are working hard and trying to turn things around," Kohli said, ahead of Saturday's first ODI against England.
"If it was before the tour began, there would have been pressure on us [to live up to World champions status]. Now, considering how the tour has gone, it's up to us to just focus on cricket and not anything else," he added.
Most of us would like to bat through 20-25 overs
The 22-year-old middle-order batsman said youngsters in the team have had enough time to prepare for the One-day series and they will try and give their best in the rest of the tour.
"There are fresh faces with the mindset to do well and have had time to prepare. We would hopefully try and win it," said Kohli, who has scored 2153 runs from 59 matches at an average of 43.94.
"We need to be tight and have strong bonding and leave out everything else. That's how we did well in World Cup. Just be together and not worry about anything else. I can feel in Indian dressing room that bonding is still there," he added.
The Delhi batsman believes it would be important for his side's batsmen to take up the responsibility and try and win matches single-handedly.
"The challenge is tough. They are really a good side. We have to take the responsibility in the middle order. Most of us would like to bat through 20-25 overs.
"We would all like to take up responsibility. You need to have the belief you can win the game single handedly. If we go with that mindset, we would put up strong challenge and compete," Kohli said.
If I am asked to bowl 4-5 overs, I am up for it'
Kohli, who joined the squad as a replacement for Yuvraj Singh, said he prefers preparing for a contest mentally.
"I'd rather make myself mentally prepared -- take sometime off the game, not to bat at the nets at all, or might be batting regularly for a week. I need to do whatever makes me comfortable mentally," he said.
India is struggling to fill up the 10 overs of the fifth bowler, and Kohli, who got Kevin Pietersen stumped off his bowling at Old Trafford, said he is ready for the job.
"It wasn't planned. I tried to bowl a straight ball and it ended up being wide and he was stumped. I like bowling. I believe in myself that I wouldn't get smashed for 8-9 runs in an over. If I am asked to bowl 4-5 overs, I am up for it," he said.
"There are fresh faces with the mindset to do well and have had time to prepare. We would hopefully try and win it," said Kohli, who has scored 2153 runs from 59 matches at an average of 43.94.
"We need to be tight and have strong bonding and leave out everything else. That's how we did well in World Cup. Just be together and not worry about anything else. I can feel in Indian dressing room that bonding is still there," he added.
The Delhi batsman believes it would be important for his side's batsmen to take up the responsibility and try and win matches single-handedly.
"The challenge is tough. They are really a good side. We have to take the responsibility in the middle order. Most of us would like to bat through 20-25 overs.
"We would all like to take up responsibility. You need to have the belief you can win the game single handedly. If we go with that mindset, we would put up strong challenge and compete," Kohli said.
If I am asked to bowl 4-5 overs, I am up for it'
Kohli, who joined the squad as a replacement for Yuvraj Singh, said he prefers preparing for a contest mentally.
"I'd rather make myself mentally prepared -- take sometime off the game, not to bat at the nets at all, or might be batting regularly for a week. I need to do whatever makes me comfortable mentally," he said.
India is struggling to fill up the 10 overs of the fifth bowler, and Kohli, who got Kevin Pietersen stumped off his bowling at Old Trafford, said he is ready for the job.
"It wasn't planned. I tried to bowl a straight ball and it ended up being wide and he was stumped. I like bowling. I believe in myself that I wouldn't get smashed for 8-9 runs in an over. If I am asked to bowl 4-5 overs, I am up for it," he said.
England alone don't bowl short
Most international teams now look to pepper India's young batsmen with bouncers, but Kohli doesn't see any problem with short-pitched bowling.
"England alone don't bowl short. South Africans do as well. West Indians do. As an international cricketer, you can't expect not to get short bowling. If you try to run away you could end up somewhere else. If you are positive, you can handle short stuff from any kind of bowler. As far as I am concerned, I am up for it. I have no problem," he said.
Kohli said there was no let-up in their game and India had put up a tough fight in the last one-off Twenty20 match but, unfortunately, they could not stop the English cricketers from winning the tie.
"We fought really well in the last game. There wasn't any sign of letting the game go at any point of time. There was an odd mistake here and a bad decision here and there and it can cost you a game. We did really well to fight back but unfortunately we couldn't win the game," he said.
"England alone don't bowl short. South Africans do as well. West Indians do. As an international cricketer, you can't expect not to get short bowling. If you try to run away you could end up somewhere else. If you are positive, you can handle short stuff from any kind of bowler. As far as I am concerned, I am up for it. I have no problem," he said.
Kohli said there was no let-up in their game and India had put up a tough fight in the last one-off Twenty20 match but, unfortunately, they could not stop the English cricketers from winning the tie.
"We fought really well in the last game. There wasn't any sign of letting the game go at any point of time. There was an odd mistake here and a bad decision here and there and it can cost you a game. We did really well to fight back but unfortunately we couldn't win the game," he said.
Dhoni rues lack of partnerships after T20 defeat
Indian cricket captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni blamed his side's six-wicket loss to England in their one-off Twenty20 International on the batsmen's failure to build partnerships.
Partnership is key, doesn't matter what format it is. Once you lose quick wickets, like we did after 12 overs, it doesn't help. You want to have at least five or six wickets in the slog overs," remarked Dhoni after his side lost nine wickets.
India were 104 for one in the 13th over before being bowled out for 165, with three balls remaining.
Dhoni said one of the reasons for his side losing quick wickets was because they wanted to press on for 15-20 runs extra to make up for the lack of a fifth bowler.
"Since we don't have the fifth bowler, we wanted to push a bit hard. We wanted to get those extra 15-20 runs and in the process we lost quick wickets.
"Once you lose quick wickets it becomes difficult. Virat (Kohli) hasn't bowled much in Twenty20 format and there were two part-time off-spinners," he said.
Partnership is key, doesn't matter what format it is. Once you lose quick wickets, like we did after 12 overs, it doesn't help. You want to have at least five or six wickets in the slog overs," remarked Dhoni after his side lost nine wickets.
India were 104 for one in the 13th over before being bowled out for 165, with three balls remaining.
Dhoni said one of the reasons for his side losing quick wickets was because they wanted to press on for 15-20 runs extra to make up for the lack of a fifth bowler.
"Since we don't have the fifth bowler, we wanted to push a bit hard. We wanted to get those extra 15-20 runs and in the process we lost quick wickets.
"Once you lose quick wickets it becomes difficult. Virat (Kohli) hasn't bowled much in Twenty20 format and there were two part-time off-spinners," he said.
Problem of fifth bowler persists
Even though India struggled to get through the quota of fifth bowler between Kohli and Rohit Sharma, the four overs cost the visitors 48 runs and Dhoni doesn't see the possibility of the team going with six batters and five bowlers in the forthcoming one-day series.
"In the last two years, we haven't played with five bowlers. I don't see it happening now. We don't want to play with a batter light (less)."
"In the last two years, we haven't played with five bowlers. I don't see it happening now. We don't want to play with a batter light (less)."
'Rahane expressed himself'
Two bright aspects for India were the batting of young opener Ajinkya Rahane who made 61 and Rahul Dravid who slammed three sixes in his knock of 31 runs.
"Rahane expressed himself. He didn't worry too much about the occasion. Whenever the ball was in his area, he scored most off them. He got over 50 runs which was critical for us.
"As for Dravid, he tends to take the leg to the ball in longer formats of the game but here he needed to take the leg out of the line of the ball. That's what you sometimes need to do in international cricket," he added.
"Rahane expressed himself. He didn't worry too much about the occasion. Whenever the ball was in his area, he scored most off them. He got over 50 runs which was critical for us.
"As for Dravid, he tends to take the leg to the ball in longer formats of the game but here he needed to take the leg out of the line of the ball. That's what you sometimes need to do in international cricket," he added.
Thursday, August 18, 2011
Same old story as India struggle at The Oval
For a team low on confidence, it is imperative to get off to a good start. It can lift the spirit.
Team India's case was different.
Going into the opening day of the fourth and final Test against England , the visitors had lost their best bowler, Praveen Kumar , to a thumb injury. His replacement, RP Singh , hadn't played a Test match in 28 months, and to expect instant results from him seemed a tad too far-fetched.
There was a surprise in store at the toss as well. Andrew Strauss , having called correctly, opted to have a bat first -- a somewhat surprising decision considering the conditions at The Oval were overcast, as expected.
Andrew StraussHowever, England's captain had confidence in his batsmen. The same couldn't be said for his Indian counterpart though.
MS Dhoni's bowlers were a tired lot. No wonder he had expressed his desire to bat first and put up a good total on board on the eve of the Test. True to form, the Indian bowlers did precious little in the first hour.
Ishant, Sreesanth and RP had neither speed nor direction. Strauss and Cook were never really tested. The duo started on a cautious note before slowly freeing their arms. There was a free flow of runs thereafter and the 50-run partnership was achieved in the 16th over -- a record 31st 50-plus stand for the pair, 27 of those having come for the first wicket.
When lunch was called, the home team had scored 75 without loss off 26 overs. Strauss was batting on 38 and Cook on 34.
The Indian think tank has a lot of work to do during the breather to prevent the home team running away with the match.
Team India's case was different.
Going into the opening day of the fourth and final Test against England , the visitors had lost their best bowler, Praveen Kumar , to a thumb injury. His replacement, RP Singh , hadn't played a Test match in 28 months, and to expect instant results from him seemed a tad too far-fetched.
There was a surprise in store at the toss as well. Andrew Strauss , having called correctly, opted to have a bat first -- a somewhat surprising decision considering the conditions at The Oval were overcast, as expected.
Andrew StraussHowever, England's captain had confidence in his batsmen. The same couldn't be said for his Indian counterpart though.
MS Dhoni's bowlers were a tired lot. No wonder he had expressed his desire to bat first and put up a good total on board on the eve of the Test. True to form, the Indian bowlers did precious little in the first hour.
Ishant, Sreesanth and RP had neither speed nor direction. Strauss and Cook were never really tested. The duo started on a cautious note before slowly freeing their arms. There was a free flow of runs thereafter and the 50-run partnership was achieved in the 16th over -- a record 31st 50-plus stand for the pair, 27 of those having come for the first wicket.
When lunch was called, the home team had scored 75 without loss off 26 overs. Strauss was batting on 38 and Cook on 34.
The Indian think tank has a lot of work to do during the breather to prevent the home team running away with the match.
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
India played too much cricket
Former captain Kapil Dev has lashed out at Team India for lacking team spirit in the ongoing Test series against England, and also criticized senior cricketers, including captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Sachin Tendulkar, for not motivating the youngsters in the squad.
The former all-rounder, who led India to its maiden World Cup title in 1983, slammed Dhoni's men for "going through the motion(s) more than their love for the game" in the ongoing four-match series, which England have already pocketed with an unassailable 3-0 lead.
"Indian players did not play as a team. I am not trying to blame anybody, but I think they played too much cricket. Within four days of winning the World Cup you play IPL. They then travel to West Indies for a tour and then from there to England. I think our players were going through the motion(s) more than their love for the game," Kapil told Press Trust of India.
Asked whether there are any other reasons for the humiliating defeat against England, which dislodged India from the No 1 position, Kapil said the seniors have not guided the youngsters during the tour.
"No cricketer walked up to young bowlers to advise them on what line to bowl. Dhoni could go up to Ishant (Sharma) and tell this. Media termed him as 'Captain Cool'. He says everybody should know their job.
"In Indian sports, we have not reached that level where all the players know what they should do. We still look up to the captain and senior players. We need somebody with aggression. All the senior players have become so senior that they do not want to be aggressive," he said.
The former all-rounder, who led India to its maiden World Cup title in 1983, slammed Dhoni's men for "going through the motion(s) more than their love for the game" in the ongoing four-match series, which England have already pocketed with an unassailable 3-0 lead.
"Indian players did not play as a team. I am not trying to blame anybody, but I think they played too much cricket. Within four days of winning the World Cup you play IPL. They then travel to West Indies for a tour and then from there to England. I think our players were going through the motion(s) more than their love for the game," Kapil told Press Trust of India.
Asked whether there are any other reasons for the humiliating defeat against England, which dislodged India from the No 1 position, Kapil said the seniors have not guided the youngsters during the tour.
"No cricketer walked up to young bowlers to advise them on what line to bowl. Dhoni could go up to Ishant (Sharma) and tell this. Media termed him as 'Captain Cool'. He says everybody should know their job.
"In Indian sports, we have not reached that level where all the players know what they should do. We still look up to the captain and senior players. We need somebody with aggression. All the senior players have become so senior that they do not want to be aggressive," he said.
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Is a defensive Fletcher costing Team India?
Well, people might agree or disagree, but Duncan Fletcher doesn't seem to be the right man to coach Team India. The biggest challenge Fletcher faces is taking forward the legacy that India'a World Cup-winning coach Gary Kirsten left behind.
His record was phenomenal. He not only helped India lift the World Cup but also won five out of the nine ODI tournaments India contested under him. Then in Tests, of the eight series he coached India in, the team won three, drew four and lost just one.
Comparing him to Fletcher, the Zimbabwean has already faltered at his first real challenge against former wards England, after winning against the lowly Caribbeans.
First Test series that India played under him was against West Indies, where the team just about managed to beat a struggling West Indies 1-0. But what that tour will be remembered for is India's surrender in the third Test, where the team needed just 86 runs to win off the last 15 overs with seven wickets in hand. But MS Dhoni chose to shake hands for a draw. Maybe that reflected the defensive mindset of the new India coach.
Kirsten's replacement was hired to maintain the winning momentum. But Fletcher seems to have brought a defensiveness to a team that was fast becoming know for its aggressiveness under MS Dhoni.
Under Kirsten, not once we saw India losing without a fight. You never saw players keeping with hands in the pocket and lost on the field with no idea of what's going around.
India needed a coach who could groom young players and take it from where Kirsten left, but considering how things have started for Fletcher, it doesn't look too promising, though it may be too early to call.
Maybe the new coach will have to take a stand with the BCCI, whose callous scheduling is hurting India as much as Fletcher's defensive tactics. Players, at times, need the coach to take their case forward and tell the board what's the best way forward - especially schedule wise.
Fletcher came into BCCI's frame as a planner who outwits and outplans oppositions but it seems exactly the opposite has transpired against England, where India stares at the possibility of a 4-0 whitewash. There just seems to be no gameplan against the English batsmen and that's where Fletcher has been a big disappointment. He should have been familiar with his former wards' strengths and weaknesses but that didn't happen.
Hope things change in the future series, and the tour of Australia later this year will surely help us better gauge how long can a 'defensive' Fletcher stay in the Indian dressing room.
Source: http://cricketnext.in.com/
His record was phenomenal. He not only helped India lift the World Cup but also won five out of the nine ODI tournaments India contested under him. Then in Tests, of the eight series he coached India in, the team won three, drew four and lost just one.
Comparing him to Fletcher, the Zimbabwean has already faltered at his first real challenge against former wards England, after winning against the lowly Caribbeans.
First Test series that India played under him was against West Indies, where the team just about managed to beat a struggling West Indies 1-0. But what that tour will be remembered for is India's surrender in the third Test, where the team needed just 86 runs to win off the last 15 overs with seven wickets in hand. But MS Dhoni chose to shake hands for a draw. Maybe that reflected the defensive mindset of the new India coach.
Kirsten's replacement was hired to maintain the winning momentum. But Fletcher seems to have brought a defensiveness to a team that was fast becoming know for its aggressiveness under MS Dhoni.
Under Kirsten, not once we saw India losing without a fight. You never saw players keeping with hands in the pocket and lost on the field with no idea of what's going around.
India needed a coach who could groom young players and take it from where Kirsten left, but considering how things have started for Fletcher, it doesn't look too promising, though it may be too early to call.
Maybe the new coach will have to take a stand with the BCCI, whose callous scheduling is hurting India as much as Fletcher's defensive tactics. Players, at times, need the coach to take their case forward and tell the board what's the best way forward - especially schedule wise.
Fletcher came into BCCI's frame as a planner who outwits and outplans oppositions but it seems exactly the opposite has transpired against England, where India stares at the possibility of a 4-0 whitewash. There just seems to be no gameplan against the English batsmen and that's where Fletcher has been a big disappointment. He should have been familiar with his former wards' strengths and weaknesses but that didn't happen.
Hope things change in the future series, and the tour of Australia later this year will surely help us better gauge how long can a 'defensive' Fletcher stay in the Indian dressing room.
Source: http://cricketnext.in.com/
BCCI accepts Kumble's suggestion: report
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is said to have accepted the suggestion made by former Indian captain and current president of the Karnataka Cricket Association (KCA), Anil Kumble, to include three warm-up games in their series against Australia later this year.
Kumble's proposal to include two more first class games to the one already scheduled ahead of the opening Boxing Day (Dec 26) Test at Melbourne came at the Board's working committee meeting here on Monday.
"Kumble said that if only one first-class game is fixed only 11 players will be able to play in it and he wanted all 16 touring members to have a competitive game before the start of the Test series by having more games. His suggestion has been accepted," sources told PTI.
The Indian squad, led by Mahendra Singh Dhoni, played a lone first class game against Somerset during the ongoing tour of England before sliding to massive defeats in the first three Tests to also lose its No. 1 Test ranking which it had held on to for more than a year-and-a-half.
The sources also conceded it will be a tricky task for the Board to try and add more first-class games in the tune-up to the tour as there was hardly any time gap between the conclusion of the home ODI series against the West Indies and the departure of the team to Australia.
The BCCI has also written to Cricket Australia that the first-class game that is already scheduled should not be reduced to a club-level affair as it clashed with the commencement of the country's "Big Bash" T20 tournament.
"The Board has already written (to Cricket Australia) that it should not be reduced to club-level cricket with the top players not playing," the sources said.
The lone warm-up game is to be played against Cricket Australia Chairman's XI from December 18-21 at Manuka Oval in Canberra, before the opening contest of the four-match Test series.
India play the four Tests back-to-back from December 26, 2011 to January 28, 2012 at Melbourne, Sydney, Perth and Adelaide.
India are then set to play two T20 Internationals on February 1 and 3 at Sydney and Melbourne before taking part in a triangular ODI series also featuring the hosts and Sri Lanka between February 5 and March 8.
Kumble's proposal to include two more first class games to the one already scheduled ahead of the opening Boxing Day (Dec 26) Test at Melbourne came at the Board's working committee meeting here on Monday.
"Kumble said that if only one first-class game is fixed only 11 players will be able to play in it and he wanted all 16 touring members to have a competitive game before the start of the Test series by having more games. His suggestion has been accepted," sources told PTI.
The Indian squad, led by Mahendra Singh Dhoni, played a lone first class game against Somerset during the ongoing tour of England before sliding to massive defeats in the first three Tests to also lose its No. 1 Test ranking which it had held on to for more than a year-and-a-half.
The sources also conceded it will be a tricky task for the Board to try and add more first-class games in the tune-up to the tour as there was hardly any time gap between the conclusion of the home ODI series against the West Indies and the departure of the team to Australia.
The BCCI has also written to Cricket Australia that the first-class game that is already scheduled should not be reduced to a club-level affair as it clashed with the commencement of the country's "Big Bash" T20 tournament.
"The Board has already written (to Cricket Australia) that it should not be reduced to club-level cricket with the top players not playing," the sources said.
The lone warm-up game is to be played against Cricket Australia Chairman's XI from December 18-21 at Manuka Oval in Canberra, before the opening contest of the four-match Test series.
India play the four Tests back-to-back from December 26, 2011 to January 28, 2012 at Melbourne, Sydney, Perth and Adelaide.
India are then set to play two T20 Internationals on February 1 and 3 at Sydney and Melbourne before taking part in a triangular ODI series also featuring the hosts and Sri Lanka between February 5 and March 8.
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
Gavaskar takes a dig at England team
Former Indian captain Sunil Gavaskar believes England's cricketers would have "hit the panic button" and talked of leaving the series midway if similar riots had happened in India.
Click here!
England and India face off in the third cricket Test in Edgbaston amid growing riots in the UK after a youth was allegedly killed in police firing.
Sunil GavaskarGavaskar said a situation like this in India would have evoked reactions of wanting to leave by English cricketers.
"No question about it, they would have been pressing the panic button. They would have been talking in terms of the team returning home. That is a given," Gavaskar told the Sun newspaper.
England, under Kevin Pietersen , did leave a tour of India midway after the Mumbai terror attacks in 2008 but came back to complete the series after a while.
Current Test captain Andrew Strauss has, meanwhile, insisted that the tensions on the street have not affected his team's preparation for the third Test, a win in which would give England an unbeatable 3-0 lead in the series and the World No 1 tag.
"When you watch scenes on TV, it is horrific and far from England's proudest moment. But, in terms of our preparation, it has not affected us. We intend going out and playing the game as we would any other.
"A few of the guys went out early on Monday evening but the advice from our security manager was to come back as there were some disturbances. This is an opportunity for cricket to put out a feel-good factor," he said.
Source:- http://www.rediff.com/cricket/report/india-england-gavaskar-takes-a-dig-at-england-team-london-riots/20110810.htm
Click here!
England and India face off in the third cricket Test in Edgbaston amid growing riots in the UK after a youth was allegedly killed in police firing.
Sunil GavaskarGavaskar said a situation like this in India would have evoked reactions of wanting to leave by English cricketers.
"No question about it, they would have been pressing the panic button. They would have been talking in terms of the team returning home. That is a given," Gavaskar told the Sun newspaper.
England, under Kevin Pietersen , did leave a tour of India midway after the Mumbai terror attacks in 2008 but came back to complete the series after a while.
Current Test captain Andrew Strauss has, meanwhile, insisted that the tensions on the street have not affected his team's preparation for the third Test, a win in which would give England an unbeatable 3-0 lead in the series and the World No 1 tag.
"When you watch scenes on TV, it is horrific and far from England's proudest moment. But, in terms of our preparation, it has not affected us. We intend going out and playing the game as we would any other.
"A few of the guys went out early on Monday evening but the advice from our security manager was to come back as there were some disturbances. This is an opportunity for cricket to put out a feel-good factor," he said.
Source:- http://www.rediff.com/cricket/report/india-england-gavaskar-takes-a-dig-at-england-team-london-riots/20110810.htm
I've been very lucky in my Test career: Bresnan
Edgbaston, Aug 9 (IANS) England all-rounder Tim Bresnan revels in the glory of being a steady bowler who can 'bat a bit' and 'never lets anyone down'.
Bresnan's solid performance with both bat and ball in Trent Bridge has assured him of a place in the Edgbaston Test. He scored 90 in England's second innings and then secured his first five-wicket haul as England won by 319 runs with a day to spare.
It's just one of those things. I've been very lucky in my Test career and I felt ecstatic after we won in Nottingham,' Bresnan was quoted as saying by The Guardian.
Despite his sterling performance in Trent Bridge, Bresnan insists he has not been given any assurances.
'There's not been a bit of that. When the team finally gets announced it's going to be as interesting for me as everyone else. The selectors have got a nice headache - at least it's nice for them. I'm glad it's not me making the decision although I also hope it's not me who is disappointed. It would be hard for me personally, but it's terrific for English cricket,' he said.
Asked if the uncertainty has taken some pleasure away, Bresnan said: 'No, not at all. I've just been enjoying how well I played and I've also been trying to move house this last week. That's helped take my mind off this next Test, which is probably healthy.
'But we have such strength in depth. Look at Stevie Finn. He's got the highest strike rate of anyone playing at the minute and he's the youngest bowler to have reached 50 Test wickets. But he can't get into the team right now.'
If Bresnan plays the third Test and India are beaten then England would become the world's No.1 Test side. It could be Bresnan's ninth consecutive Test victory.
'It would be nice to get to 10 Test wins by the end of this series. If we go to Edgbaston and produce the same performance, it's going to be hard for India. But we know how strong they are and there is absolutely no reason for us to get complacent. We've just got to keep doing the basics well - and producing to hold on to our places,' he said.
Source:- http://cricket.yahoo.com/cricket/news/article?id=item/2.0/-/story/cricket.indiaabroad.com/ive-been-very-lucky-my-test-career-bresnan-20110809/
Bresnan's solid performance with both bat and ball in Trent Bridge has assured him of a place in the Edgbaston Test. He scored 90 in England's second innings and then secured his first five-wicket haul as England won by 319 runs with a day to spare.
It's just one of those things. I've been very lucky in my Test career and I felt ecstatic after we won in Nottingham,' Bresnan was quoted as saying by The Guardian.
Despite his sterling performance in Trent Bridge, Bresnan insists he has not been given any assurances.
'There's not been a bit of that. When the team finally gets announced it's going to be as interesting for me as everyone else. The selectors have got a nice headache - at least it's nice for them. I'm glad it's not me making the decision although I also hope it's not me who is disappointed. It would be hard for me personally, but it's terrific for English cricket,' he said.
Asked if the uncertainty has taken some pleasure away, Bresnan said: 'No, not at all. I've just been enjoying how well I played and I've also been trying to move house this last week. That's helped take my mind off this next Test, which is probably healthy.
'But we have such strength in depth. Look at Stevie Finn. He's got the highest strike rate of anyone playing at the minute and he's the youngest bowler to have reached 50 Test wickets. But he can't get into the team right now.'
If Bresnan plays the third Test and India are beaten then England would become the world's No.1 Test side. It could be Bresnan's ninth consecutive Test victory.
'It would be nice to get to 10 Test wins by the end of this series. If we go to Edgbaston and produce the same performance, it's going to be hard for India. But we know how strong they are and there is absolutely no reason for us to get complacent. We've just got to keep doing the basics well - and producing to hold on to our places,' he said.
Source:- http://cricket.yahoo.com/cricket/news/article?id=item/2.0/-/story/cricket.indiaabroad.com/ive-been-very-lucky-my-test-career-bresnan-20110809/
Sunday, August 7, 2011
Dravid announces retirement from ODI and T20 cricket
Less than 12 hours after earning a shock recall to India’s ODI squad, Rahul Dravid announced his retirement from one-day and T20 cricket at the end of the England tour.
Dravid made the announcement after India’s practice game against Northamptonshire.
“I am honoured and privileged to be selected for the one-day team,” Dravid said.
“Since I had not been picked for one-day cricket for the last two years, I was obviously a little surprised and to be honest, because I had not been picked, I had not informed the selectors or the board of my desire to solely focus on Test cricket.”
“At the end of this one-day series, I would like to announce my retirement from one-day and Twenty20 cricket and concentrate only on Test cricket. I am committed, as always to give my best to India in this one-day series and obviously the Test series that follows.”
"In the short term I am committed because now I have been picked for the series, but in the long term I think it is best for me and Indian cricket that I focus on Test cricket."
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Yuvraj successfully crosses Trent Bridge
It was not his defining innings. Yet it carried a lot of meaning - for him and for India. Yuvraj Singh was returning to Test cricket after a year-long hiatus in his fitful eight-year career in the longer form of the game. As the Man of the 2011 World Cup, and India's heartbeat in the tournament, walked into a sunny Trent Bridge arena, the English fans, led by the boisterous Barmy Army parked inside the Fox Road stand, started jeering. Used to taunts from much larger crowds in India, Yuvraj walked onto the field languidly. From afar, his body language suggested he would rather be sitting and sipping English tea in the beautiful dressing-room balcony.
Andrew Strauss crowded Yuvraj with four slips, a gully, point and a short leg. Immediately, James Anderson piped out two absolute jaffas that beat Yuvraj and had him jumping and rolling his eyes. "Welcome back to Test cricket," Anderson and Co. might have jibed. Off his fifth delivery, against Stuart Broad, he played softly into the hands of Kevin Pietersen at gully. Luckily the man who had labelled Yuvraj as a "pie chucker" let the easiest offering of the day slip through.
Tim Bresnan replaced Anderson, and he and Broad tried hurrying up Yuvraj with seam movement and surprise bounce. But as the minutes passed, Yuvraj settled down.
For a man coming out of the cold, Yuvraj showed an amazing ability to time the ball whenever he thought he could hit it. This was his first international match after the World Cup; he missed out on the Caribbean trip because of a lung infection he picked up during the IPL.
His position in the squad had raised a few eyebrows especially since he has never been an automatic selection in Tests over the years. He has made eight comebacks in as many years, destined to do the 12th-man duties whenever he returned. But as witnessed during the World Cup, there is a certain calmness to Yuvraj these days. Viewed wrongly, it could be judged as being aloof. But in fact he has worked hard to understand his game and his shortcomings. He has probably started accepting them and that has allowed him to move on.
Today he did not let those early hurdles stop him. With the sun out and the ball old, he understood Graeme Swann, who had not bowled till the second session, would be given the ball. England might have been confident considering the world's No.1 spinner has a terrific record against left-handers. That and Yuvraj's well-recorded troubles facing spin gave hope to the hosts.
It was also a critical time for India. After the quick departures of Sachin Tendulkar and Suresh Raina, Rahul Dravid needed a man who could stand his ground and not get drawn into erroneous strokes. An angry Dravid had charged over to Yuvraj after Pietersen's spill and advised him.
Swann's entry only eased Yuvraj's nerves as he played with freedom both on the back foot as well as on the up. His timing was perfect as he unleashed a wide array of strokes - the sweep, the powerful cut, the flowing cover drive through silly mid-off and cover. A pull over midwicket for four off Swann took Yuvraj to a brisk fifty. Dravid, this time, joined the crowd in their applause and congratulated Yuvraj, showing how much confidence he had derived from, and had in, Yuvraj.
"After we lost Sachin there was some pressure, and then we lost Suresh. I thought Yuvraj played really well and that partnership was really good," Dravid said at the end of the day. "We knew that 60-80 over period before the new ball was crucial and there was not much help for the spinners. So we needed to cash in and Yuvraj played some shots and got to a good score."
Former West Indies fast bowler Michael Holding felt England had missed a trick by not persisting with the fast men against Yuvraj. His reasoning was that Yuvraj had shown he was suspect against the moving ball and at times against the fast, short delivery. Yuvraj, though, did not panic as Raina had during his brief stint at the crease. In fact, after the early jitters, Yuvraj became more assured about which balls to leave and when to go for his shots. With Dravid at the other end, he understood how to construct an innings and not throw away a start.
Yuvraj's 128-run partnership with Dravid seemed to have put India on course for a total of 400, a score that would have put England under the cosh. That did not happen. But in those 132 minutes, Yuvraj showed he belonged. He showed he could adapt and learn quickly from his mistakes. It was a partnership that has kept India in the game and given them a slight edge.
If India go on to level the series, Yuvraj will definitely provide a headache for the team management. But they won't mind it.
Andrew Strauss crowded Yuvraj with four slips, a gully, point and a short leg. Immediately, James Anderson piped out two absolute jaffas that beat Yuvraj and had him jumping and rolling his eyes. "Welcome back to Test cricket," Anderson and Co. might have jibed. Off his fifth delivery, against Stuart Broad, he played softly into the hands of Kevin Pietersen at gully. Luckily the man who had labelled Yuvraj as a "pie chucker" let the easiest offering of the day slip through.
Tim Bresnan replaced Anderson, and he and Broad tried hurrying up Yuvraj with seam movement and surprise bounce. But as the minutes passed, Yuvraj settled down.
For a man coming out of the cold, Yuvraj showed an amazing ability to time the ball whenever he thought he could hit it. This was his first international match after the World Cup; he missed out on the Caribbean trip because of a lung infection he picked up during the IPL.
His position in the squad had raised a few eyebrows especially since he has never been an automatic selection in Tests over the years. He has made eight comebacks in as many years, destined to do the 12th-man duties whenever he returned. But as witnessed during the World Cup, there is a certain calmness to Yuvraj these days. Viewed wrongly, it could be judged as being aloof. But in fact he has worked hard to understand his game and his shortcomings. He has probably started accepting them and that has allowed him to move on.
Today he did not let those early hurdles stop him. With the sun out and the ball old, he understood Graeme Swann, who had not bowled till the second session, would be given the ball. England might have been confident considering the world's No.1 spinner has a terrific record against left-handers. That and Yuvraj's well-recorded troubles facing spin gave hope to the hosts.
It was also a critical time for India. After the quick departures of Sachin Tendulkar and Suresh Raina, Rahul Dravid needed a man who could stand his ground and not get drawn into erroneous strokes. An angry Dravid had charged over to Yuvraj after Pietersen's spill and advised him.
Swann's entry only eased Yuvraj's nerves as he played with freedom both on the back foot as well as on the up. His timing was perfect as he unleashed a wide array of strokes - the sweep, the powerful cut, the flowing cover drive through silly mid-off and cover. A pull over midwicket for four off Swann took Yuvraj to a brisk fifty. Dravid, this time, joined the crowd in their applause and congratulated Yuvraj, showing how much confidence he had derived from, and had in, Yuvraj.
"After we lost Sachin there was some pressure, and then we lost Suresh. I thought Yuvraj played really well and that partnership was really good," Dravid said at the end of the day. "We knew that 60-80 over period before the new ball was crucial and there was not much help for the spinners. So we needed to cash in and Yuvraj played some shots and got to a good score."
Former West Indies fast bowler Michael Holding felt England had missed a trick by not persisting with the fast men against Yuvraj. His reasoning was that Yuvraj had shown he was suspect against the moving ball and at times against the fast, short delivery. Yuvraj, though, did not panic as Raina had during his brief stint at the crease. In fact, after the early jitters, Yuvraj became more assured about which balls to leave and when to go for his shots. With Dravid at the other end, he understood how to construct an innings and not throw away a start.
Yuvraj's 128-run partnership with Dravid seemed to have put India on course for a total of 400, a score that would have put England under the cosh. That did not happen. But in those 132 minutes, Yuvraj showed he belonged. He showed he could adapt and learn quickly from his mistakes. It was a partnership that has kept India in the game and given them a slight edge.
If India go on to level the series, Yuvraj will definitely provide a headache for the team management. But they won't mind it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)